I argued yesterday that Apple’s antitrust battles aren’t going to go away and that the company needs to be willing to take positive steps to make things fairer. A report today says that the company is progressing plans to do exactly that, in South Korea.

It will, though, need to satisfy the competition watchdog there that its proposed remedies go far enough …

Background

The origins of the case date all the way back to 2016 when Apple was accused of using its dominant position to force local carriers to agree to unfair terms, in exchange for being allowed to sell iPhones.

We learned much more about the specifics last year.

An investigation by the country’s Fair Trade Commission found that Apple was indeed guilty of unfair practices, echoing a similar ruling in France.

  • Carriers had to buy minimum quantities of each model, dictated by Apple
  • Carriers had to share the cost of warranty repairs or replacements
  • Carriers had to pay to run Apple’s own TV ads for the iPhone

Budget-focused carriers might, for example, want to buy only older and cheaper models, as that’s what their customers want, but Apple would force them to buy flagship models too. And if a phone proved faulty, Apple wouldn’t just replace it but would oblige carriers to meet some of the costs.

Finally, although carriers had to pay the full cost of running iPhone ads on TV, they were only allowed to use Apple’s own ads, and the only thing they were permitted to change was adding their own logo to the final frame.

The FTC argued this was unfair on competing smartphone companies, who did not have the same leverage. Carriers would also have to find ways to recoup the costs imposed by Apple.

Apple will be allowed to end antitrust battle

Apple has asked for an opportunity to come up with proposals to right the wrongs, and The Korea Herald says that the regulator has granted permission to present these – though it will need to be satisfied that they go far enough.

The proposals are expected to include repaying some of the TV ad costs, doing the same for warranty service performed by carriers, and creating some kind of compensation fund. Beneficiaries of this are said to include consumers, though it’s unclear how this might work.

The Fair Trade Commission said it will review detailed corrective measures crafted by Apple Korea and decide whether to approve them.

These types of agreements are common in South Korea, offering companies the opportunity to set things right while saving face by not having to admit any wrong-doing in the first place.

Photo: Slashgear